Charles B. Dew. Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War. Charlottesville and London: University Press of. Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War. Front Cover. Charles B. Dew. University Press of Virginia, Apostles of Disunion has ratings and 70 reviews. Charles B. Dew, Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil.
|Published (Last):||14 December 2005|
|PDF File Size:||19.10 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.58 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Apostles of Disunion
Together, they represented the breadth of the moderate and radical political factions within the Democratic and Whig parties. He made the point that I think most people already knew – that slavery was a major cause of the Civil War.
Jan 20, Justin Dillehay rated it really liked it. In one, a speech given by a Mississippian dispatched to Georgia, it is clear that, unless revolutionary action is taken, the election of Abraham Lincoln will “overturn and strike down this great feature of our Union,” namely apostlee “it is a government for the white man, rejecting the negro, as an ignorant, inferior, barbarian race, incapable of self-government, and not, therefore, entitled to be associated with the white man upon terms of civil, political, or social equality.
I The short of it: It is a point of apostlees, but I feel it informs Dew’s narrow focus. apostkes
I’m not a Civil War junkie, but I do enjoy the subject quite a bit. This book is a much-needed corrective to the “states-rights” understanding of the cause of the Civil War that tries to explain the war without reference to slavery. The Myth of the Lost Cause: Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Dew makes a convincing argument: In light of what secession commissioners said about the cause of their struggle before the Civil War, however, the Lost Cause can only be seen as egregious historical revisionism.
Dew’s discovery and study of the highly illuminating public letters and speeches of these apostles of disunion–often relatively obscure men sent out to convert the unconverted to the secessionist cause–have led him to suggest that the arguments the commissioners presented provide us with the best evidence we have of the motives behind the secession of the lower South in There can be no denying the cause or spinning it onto something else.
Apostles of Disunion | The University of Virginia Press
The commissioners worked to squelch any hints of compromise by insisting the chasm between North and South was so wide that only permanent separation could save the South. Dew directs attention charlles a neglected source of insight.
The result is a concise assessment of the secession commissioners themselves and their beliefs, what they wrote and apotles concerning the issue of secession both privately and publicly, the reactions to their words by their audiences, and the conclusions Dew drew from his research.
Cnarles and the Tredegar Iron Works. Showing of reviews. HubPages and Hubbers authors may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others. Nevertheless, in his stated goal Dew makes a convincing and well-supported argument.
Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War
Often offering visions of the horrific bloodshed and chaos which had so recently accompanied slave revolts across the Caribbean, as examples of what the future held for the South under such circumstances. The information for these secondary sources are identified in the same manner as primary sources. This should not be so easily dismissed without a more thorough inquiry as well.
Dew demonstrates this quite skillfully in looking at a little studied piece of history in the Southern Commissioners. In their view all hope of future compromise between the North and South had been exhausted with the Republicans in power. Among those of us with brains and an inclination towards existing in reality, the causes of the Civil War have been settled for many decades.
Thus begins the incisive work that discusses one of the most debated issues scholars face with regards to the Civil War: The title reflects the sentiments of an African American activist during the civil turmoil caused by busing students in Boston, Massachusetts during the 70s and 80s last century.
He located the texts or detailed summaries of forty-one speeches or letters by various commissioners. Lists with This Book. Having gained the presidency inthe Republicans would surely abolish slavery in Washington DC and the territories, send abolitionist officials into the South, end the ban on mailing abolitionist publications to Southern addresses, and thus incite the South’s slaves to rebellion.
Learn more about Amazon Prime. Very brief, but also slightly repetitive. Such prominent southerners as Jefferson Davis and Alexander Stephens worked religiously to recast the legacy of their war against the North. The commissioners included in their speeches a constitutional justification for secession, to be sure, and they pointed to a number of political “outrages” committed by the North in the decades prior to Lincoln’s election.
Dec 22, Jim Drewery rated it really liked it. As a result, on Dec.
It is clear from these primary documents that those who took the South out of the union were concerned primarily that Lincoln’s election portended the end of slavery, despite Lincoln’s repeated promise that charlex would not take any action to end slavery where it existed. What caused secession and the Civil War? Return to Book Page.
Apostles of Disunion
Thomas Dew, in this short but compelling book, provides persuasive evidence that the As Dave Barry once noted, identifying the causes of the Civil War used to be easy: I would recommend this to anyone who reads about the Civil War, especially those wanting more explanation into the “whys” of secession.
Dew rightly observes that the causes of the Civil War remained widely disputed, making the evidence he presents, a valuable contribution to historical knowledge. Using such primary xpostles as speeches, writings, and edw of the leaders of the southern secession movement, Ded validates his thesis that southern secessionists such as Jefferson Davis, Alexander Stephens, and John Smith Preston feared that continued union with the north would lead to an disuniin war between free—labor states and slave-holding states 45 ; a clash of cultures in which southern whites protected their racial superiority to their slaves through forced subordination through the implementation of slavery He moved to Columbus, Mississippi in This was just okay.
Book Review of Charles B. History and Political Science. In fact they think they are doing it for racist reasons.
Many earned their appointments as commissioners on the basis of their connections to those states whose legislatures had yet to settle the question of secession. The main focus is on the rhetoric used University Press of Virginia- History – pages.
How though would Dew feel about the recent desecration of Confederate graves? Yet as his book demons The question of what the Civil War was fought over is both one of the most innocuous and the most divisive question in American history.